Algorithms act as a guideline for specific scenarios. They have a structured process designed to solve that specific problem. Heuristics, on the other hand, are general rules of thumb that help the brain to process information, and may or may not reach a solution.
Why do we use heuristics?
Heuristics are mental shortcuts that allows people to solve problems and make judgments quickly and efficiently.
These rule-of-thumb strategies shorten decision-making time and allow people to function without constantly stopping to think about their next course of action.
Do you think algorithms rather than heuristics is always the best way to solve problems Why or why not?
Unless you are an extremely accomplished baker, the algorithm should provide you with a better cake than using heuristics would.
While heuristics offer a solution that might be correct, a correctly applied algorithm is guaranteed to provide a correct solution.
Of course, not all problems can be solved by algorithms.
Learn more about heuristics here:
brainly.com/question/16061089
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: Passing campaign finance laws
The federal government would only be involved in creating and maintaining regulations that would affect the whole states in united states. Campaign finance laws is a form of regulation which regulate how political candidates from ALL states able to obtain their funding.
Preventable injuries, like car accidents, are the leading cause of death among children and youth ages 1-24 nationwide. Among young children ages 1-4, the most common cause of unintentional injury-related death is drowning; among 5- to 24-year-olds, it is motor vehicle accidents).
Power focuses people one the resources they controls rather than the people around them. Status increases people’s focus on others status is based on other people’s opinions
Answer:
(1) Skinner’s utopian society ought to be rejected.
Explanation:
The sentence that expresses the conclusion of the argument is, <em>Skinner’s utopian society ought to be rejected</em>. "The sort of society Skinner proposes in Walden Two is a non-competitive, lifeless society that lacks creativity and imagination. It also lacks the conditions that make for festivity and fantasy, two significant human traits. The type of society that Skinner proposes would turn people into robots. Skinner’s utopian society ought to be rejected."
