These explanations "make people feel safer and the
world more comprehensible".
The just-world hypothesis otherwise
called just world fallacy is the cognitive inclination or supposition that a
man's activities are innately disposed to convey ethically reasonable and
fitting results to that individual, to the finish of every honorable activity
being in the end compensated and every insidious activity inevitably rebuffed.
Fritz is acting assertively when he responded that his feelings were hurt by what you said and i don’t think that is okay.
<h3>What is an
assertive action?</h3>
It involves the given a open and honest views, wishes and feelings about others so that both parties act appropriately.
Hence, in this case, Fritz is acting assertively when he responded.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about assertive
<em>brainly.com/question/1382911</em>
Answer:
Meta-communication
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of communications, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term being defined is called Meta-communication. Like mentioned in the question, this is a communication discussing communication. It dictates how verbal commands or information should be interpreted by individuals as well as the stimuli that is added to the verbal information that has been provided.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Yellow Journalism: Adding fake information into a text to make a story more interesting.
Realist: Real information in the text.
Muckraker: Digs up the hidden bad stuff to make an interesting story.
