Answer:
Merger premium per share is equal to $2
Explanation:
Step 1. Given information.
- 1500 shares outstanding
- market price of 22
- Blackstone has 2.500 shares
- Outstanding price 38
- Blackstone acquire Rudy's for $36.000
Step 2. Formulas needed to solve the exercise.
Merger premium per share = (Blackstone acquire Rudy's /shares outstanding) - market price
Step 3. Calculation.
Merger premium per share = ($36,000/1,500) - $22 = $2
Step 4. Solution.
Merger premium per share is equal to $2
Answer:
The incremental manufacturing cost that the company will incur if it increases production from 10,500 to 10,501 units is closest to $11.40
Explanation:
It is important to note that the question requires The incremental manufacturing cost that the company will incur if it increases production from 10,500 to 10,501 units
From Production of 10500 units to 10501 units, there is an increment of 1 unit.
<u>Lets find the incremental cost of 1 unit.</u>
1.To do this we only consider variable manufacturing costs only.
2.Since increase is within the relevant range, the fixed manufacturing overheads do not change.
3.Also Ignore all non- manufacturing overhead as they do not form part of manufacturing costs.
Extra 1 Unit
Direct materials $6.70
Direct labor $3.50
Variable manufacturing overhead $1.20
Total Cost $11.40
Answer:
worker is protected by a cost-of-living adjustment clause in an employment contract
Explanation:
Cost of Living Adjustment(COLA) is an increase made to income from social security to counter the inflationary effects. The COLA change is essentially equivalent to the Consumer Price Index ( CPI) percentage increase over a given period.
All other options are wrong as it is not fit to the current situation
hence, the correct option is B.
The answer is two and five.
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
