Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
They are elected, is true of most judges in Washington, as people do vote for the candidate who stands in the election.
<h3>How are
most judges chosen?</h3>
Superior court judges are elected by the public or the common people of the country, through ballot system. Entries that arise during those periods due to retirements, deaths, or other departures are filled by the Governor's appointment.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about most judges chosen, click here:
brainly.com/question/1407122
#SPJ1
Answer: Activation-synthesis hypothesis.
Explanation: Activation-synthesis hypothesis is proposed by John Allan Hobson and Robert McCarley. It is the theory of dreaming that explains that dreams are a result of biological processes. In other words it is a neurobiological theory of dreams. Activation-synthesis hypothesis theory explains that dreams are created by changes in neuron activity that activates the brainstem during rapid eye movement sleep.
He forced visits. thats what i got at least
Answer:
Self-fulfillment rather than illness
Explanation:
It is the idea that the illness will be cured of the moment you don't think about it, and focus your mind and body on a humanistic treatment, where you try to fulfill other elements that will guide you to the cure.
