Answer:
Constructivism
Explanation:
Constructivism is a theory in education that recognizes the learners' understanding and knowledge based on their own experiences prior to entering school. It is associated with various philosophical positions, particularly in epistemology as well as ontology, politics, and ethics.
Answer:
dramatic increase in reported cases of dissociative identity disorder during the past 40 or so years.
Explanation:
Biological perspective: The term "biological perspective" is described as a specific way of considering psychological issues through studying the "physical basis or cause" for human and animal behavior. It is considered one of the "major perspectives" and encompasses certain things like studying the immune system, genetics, brain, and nervous system. Therefore, the biological perspective tends to believe that most behavior is being inherited and possess an evolutionary or adaptive function.
The proper response that can be given regarding vaccine is: <u>"vaccines haven't actually contained whole bacteria since 2008"
.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
A vaccine is a substance that is prepared biologically to provide active immunity to a particular infectious disease. The vaccines are made of microbes, surface proteins and toxins that are able to kill the disease-causing microorganism.
In the above scenario, Smith doesn’t allow the doctors to vaccinate his son after knowing that the vaccines contain microbes. Actually the vaccines are made of killed form of microbe that does not harm the user. The proper response that can be made is vaccines don’t have whole bacteria since 2008.
Answer:
The different opinions of Mindy and Rahul about the same abstract painting are due to differences in <em>d) perception.</em>
Explanation:
Perception in psychology can be defined as a mental process that consists in recognizing and interpreting the data collected through the senses. No person recognizes and interprets information the same way another one does. Perception is related to the way we experience the world and the meaning each one of us gives to those experiences.
The statement is - False.
History textbooks, more often than not, are not interpreted objectively and very often the perspective and interests of the nation were a certain history textbook is out for the wider public is subjective and with nationalistic elements. This is the case in most of the countries in the world and there's countless number of examples of it, like:
The Republic of Macedonia is claiming the Macedonia region in Greece as its own ethnic and historic territory and that Alexander the Great is Macedonian, and even though it was ethnic territory of the Macedonians till recently, a Macedonian state was not existent and ruling over the region for approximately two millenniums. Greece on the other hand claims the Macedonia region as its own historic region and ALexander the Great is Greek, even though the Greeks never managed to take that region under their control until the early 20th century. Bulgarians claim that the Republic of Macedonia is their own territory as the Macedonia region in Greece as well, and considers the people in this part to be Bulgarians and that Alexander the Great is Bulgarian. That's just one simple example, and there's lots and lots around the world.
