All categories

3 years ago

After a military coup in Nigeria, economic problems continued because of

1 answer:

6 0

I think a good option is corruption: It is a widespread phenomemon in Nigeria and it is found on almost all levels of governance.

Also a problem was the inability of the government to pay the country's debt (this is probably partially connected to corruption too). (or at least to controll it somehow)

You might be interested in

There is sufficient food for 50 children for 12 days in a boy's home. If there is an increas

Hunter-Best [27]

Let the food in the boy's home be : F

Given : This food is sufficient for 50 children for 12 days

$\implies \sf{\textsf{The food consumed by 50 children in one day} : \dfrac{F}{12}}$

$\implies \sf{\textsf{The food consumed by 1 child in one day} : \dfrac{F}{12 \times 50}}$

Given : There is an increase of 10 more children

It means : Total children = 60

$\implies \sf{\textsf{The food consumed by 60 children in one day} : \dfrac{F \times 60}{12 \times 50}}$

$\implies \sf{\textsf{The food consumed by 60 children in one day} : \dfrac{F}{10}}$

$\implies \sf{\textsf{The food consumed by 60 children in 10 days} : \dfrac{F\times 10}{10}}$

$\implies \sf{\textsf{The food consumed by 60 children in 10 days} : F}$

Answer: The food is sufficient for 10 days

8 0

2 years ago

A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie.

eduard

Answer:

a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.

While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.

b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.

In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.

In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.

4 0

2 years ago

Cual es la verdad sobre el uso de la tecnología hoy en día

miv72 [106K]

Answer:

What is the truth about the use of technology today

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What is the closest state to the Chespeake Bay

Monica [59]

The closest state to the Chesapeake bay is maryland

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the census affect the reapportionment of the house?

Dennis_Churaev [7]

The Constitutional basis for conducting the decennial census is to reapportion the U.S. House of Representatives. (I think from the last time i did this but i hope that helped)

5 0

3 years ago