I believe the answer is: The government controls where people work and what the are paid.
The government control where people work by creating a protection on territories that is crucial to for the ecosystem, (such as area near water reserve or forest). The government control what are paid by creating the minimum wage law that must be followed by all businesses.
Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.
Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.
I mean.
They're both in history and ''practiced''.
Though a connection, no, Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.
Answer:
The answer is written communication.
Explanation:
Written communication can be both formal and informal; in this case, the tone is clearly formal.
One important feature of written communication is that it's usually taken as the final word, which means it can't be taken back es easily; however, the rise of instant messaging has led to a more natural and intimate use of written communication. That's why professional and academic related messages are typically sent via e-mail.
Answer:
a, b,d
Explanation:
because I did the lesson lol
<span>The Bank's existence is a great example of implied powers: the Constitution doesn't say that Congress has the right to make a bank, but its defenders claimed that one was necessary to carry out the Congress' power to collect taxes.</span>
