1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helga [31]
3 years ago
12

What did the battle of bunker hill prove?

History
1 answer:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
3 0
That America will always win
You might be interested in
How far was Nasser responsible for the outbreak of the Suez War of 1956? Please make it detailed i have to write a 600 word essa
dsp73

Answer:

The Suez crisis is often portrayed as Britain's last fling of the imperial dice.

Still, there were powerful figures in the "establishment" - a phrase coined in the early 1950s - who could not accept that Britain was no longer a first-rate power. Their case, in the context of the times, was persuasive: we had nuclear arms, a permanent seat on the UN security council, and military forces in both hemispheres. We remained a trading nation, with a vital interest in the global free passage of goods.

But there was another, darker, motive for intervention in Egypt: the sense of moral and military superiority which had accreted in the centuries of imperial expansion. Though it may now seem quaint and self-serving, there was a widespread and genuine feeling that Britain had responsibilities in its diminishing empire, to protect its peoples from communism and other forms of demagoguery.

Much more potently, there was ingrained racism. When the revolutionaries in Cairo dared to suggest that they would take charge of the Suez canal, the naked prejudice of the imperial era bubbled to the surface. The Egyptians, after all, were among the original targets of the epithet, "westernised oriental gentlemen. They were the Wogs.

King Farouk, the ruler of Egypt, was forced into exile in mid-1952. A year later, a group of army officers formally took over the government which they already controlled. The titular head of the junta was General Mohammed Neguib. The real power behind the new throne was an ambitious and visionary young colonel who dreamed of reasserting the dignity and freedom of the Arab nation, with Egypt at the heart of the renaissance. His name was Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Nasser's first target was the continued British military presence in the Suez canal zone. A source of bitter resentment among many Egyptians, that presence was a symbol of British imperial dominance since the 1880s. In 1954, having established himself as uncontested leader of Egypt, Nasser negotiated a new treaty, under which British forces would leave within 20 months.

At first, the largely peaceful transition of power in Egypt was little noticed in a world beset by turmoil and revolution.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

7 0
3 years ago
Describe the economic impact the 1996 summer olympic games had on the state of georgia
Bingel [31]
After wining the bid to host the games, Atlanta's preparations for the Olympics took more than six years and had an estimated economic impact of $5.14 billion. In the process Atlanta changed dramatically as new sports
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What fact does Antoine Lavoisier's work show? A. the overall volume before a reaction is equal to the overall volume after a rea
Jet001 [13]

The correct answer is B. Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier was a French chemist, biologist and economist who discovered <em>the law of conservation of matter</em> in 1785.

This law states that during a chemical reaction, <u>the total mass in the system remains constant</u>, that is, the mass consumed of the reactants is equal to the mass of the products obtained.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
quiénes son tus representantes de nivel ejecutivo y legislativo del Estado municipio y Distrito electoral así como también sus r
musickatia [10]
Many people were able to move closer to their jobs

4 0
3 years ago
Why did Lincoln issue the Emancipation Proclamation after The Battle Of Antietam?
lianna [129]

hehehhe time for my civil war obsession to come in handy

Lincoln needed to announce it right after a big win for the Union. Antietam happened to be a well timed one.

Doing it after a big victory would help reinforce the fact that he was doing the right thing in the war, and that he was a good leader (good enough to be re-elected).

Announcing it right after a loss would be viewed as a weak, desperate move, and Lincoln couldn't afford that if he was to be running again for president.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was the most recent group to invade northern india?
    14·1 answer
  • What two activities formed the basis of sumer economy​
    9·1 answer
  • under the zhou dynasty the social classes were divided into kings, nobles and peasants. Which class would you like to be in and
    7·1 answer
  • The Torah is the first part of the Old Testament of the Bible.<br> True<br> False
    8·2 answers
  • The charts show coal and steel production during China’s first Five-Year Plan.
    7·1 answer
  • In human memory, I believe that there is no account of a road as great as this, running through deep valleys, high mountains, ba
    12·1 answer
  • Who is the Ottoman Empire?
    9·1 answer
  • Most Harappan seals were made of ..........
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE I really need help with this question!!!!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • If Missouri came into the nation (United States = Union) as a free state, what would happen to the balance of power in the Senat
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!