Answer:
a) Portfolio ABC's expected return is 10.66667%.
Explanation:
Some information is missing:
Stock Expected Standard Beta
return deviation
A 10% 20% 1.0
B 10% 10% 1.0
C 12% 12% 1.4
The expected return or portfolio AB = (1/2 x 10%) + (1/2 x 10%) = 10% (it is the same as the required rate for stock A or B)
The expected return or portfolio ABC = (weight of stock A x expected return of stock A) + (weight of stock B x expected return of stock B) + (weight of stock C x expected return of stock C) = (1/3 x 10%) + (1/3 x 10%) + (1/3 x 12%) = 3.333% + 3.333% + 4% = 10.667% <u>THIS IS CORRECT</u>
Options B, C, D and E are wrong.
Answer:
$1,076,000
Explanation:
The computation of the carrying value of the bonds is shown below:
= Face value of the bond + unamortized bond premium
= $1,060,000 + $16,000
= $1,076,000
We simply added the face value of the bond and the unamortized bond premium so that the carrying value of the bond could come
All other information which is given is not relevant. hence, ignored it
Answer:
A) Job simplification.
Explanation:
Job simplification makes it easy to complete the whole task by dividing it into small steps. Basically this can improve productivity and efficiency.
For instance: A whole task was done by a single employee and it took him a day to complete it, through Job simplification task would be divided into steps and those sub tasks would be assigned to different employee's with a deadline to complete it in 6 hours, much less than the formal employee took.
Answer:
D. the demand for Nike running shoes is less elastic than the demand for shoes.
Explanation:
In this the substitutes would be more for the particular brand rather than the normal running shoes. Since the demand of running shoes might be less elastic as compared to the demand of nike running shows because the consumer shifted from the nike to other brand that are popular. Plus, the elasticity of demand for running shoes is considered to be inelastic as there is many subsitutes
So, the option d is correct
Answer:
C) Expense $23,000 for 2018.
Explanation:
Iris owns and operates TV rental outlets, so all the expenses she makes while investigating possible purchases of related businesses (other TV rental outlets) can be deducted from her income. This deductions can be made regardless of whether Iris ended up purchasing the new stores or not.
