Answer:
see the attachment
Step-by-step explanation:
We assume that the question is interested in the probability that a randomly chosen class is a Friday class with a lab experiment (2/15). That is somewhat different from the probability that a lab experiment is conducted on a Friday (2/3).
Based on our assumption, we want to create a simulation that includes a 1/5 chance of the day being a Friday, along with a 2/3 chance that the class has a lab experiment on whatever day it is.
That simulation can consist of choosing 1 of 5 differently-colored marbles, and rolling a 6-sided die with 2/3 of the numbers being designated as representing a lab-experiment day. (The marble must be replaced and the marbles stirred for the next trial.) For our purpose, we can designate the yellow marble as "Friday", and numbers greater than 2 as "lab-experiment".
The simulation of 70 different choices of a random class is shown in the attachment.
_____
<em>Comment on the question</em>
IMO, the use of <em>70 trials</em> is coincidentally the same number as the first <em>70 days</em> of school. The calendar is deterministic, so there will be exactly 14 Fridays in that period. If, in 70 draws, you get 16 yellow marbles, you cannot say, "the probability of a Friday is 16/70." You need to be very careful to properly state the question you're trying to answer.
Answer:
can you show a link to the graph
Step-by-step explanation:
it will help me answer
Hey there!
<span>Here are the steps involved:
</span>
1.Change 65% into a decimal. Move the decimal two places to the left and you get 0.65.
2. Multiply 0.65 by 50.
<span>140 x 0.65 = 91.
3. Since you are decreasing 140 by 65%, subtract 140 by 91.
140-91= 49
</span><span>(If you feel that my answer has helped you, please consider rating it and giving it a thank you! Also, feel free to make the best answer, the brainliest answer!)
</span>
<span>Thank you! :D</span>
Answer:
simple even tho im in 6th grade it would be over $100
Answer:
C. Kalena made a mistake in Step 3. The justification should state: -x²
+ x²
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the function x(x - 1)(x + 1) = x3 - X
To justify kelena proof
We will need to show if the two equations are equal.
Starting from the RHS with function x³-x
First we will factor out the common factor which is 'x' to have;
x(x²-1)
Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;
x(x+1)(x-1)
Note that for two real number a and b, the expansion of a²-b² using difference vof two square will give;
a²-b² = (a+b)(a-b) hence;
Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;
x(x+1)(x-1)
Factorising x(x+1) gives x²+x, therefore
x(x+1)(x-1) = (x²+x)(x-1)
(x²+x)(x-1) = x³-x²+x²-x
The function x³-x²+x²-x gotten shows that kelena made a mistake in step 3, the justification should be -x²+x² not -x-x²
