1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka94
3 years ago
15

The mayor of a town has proposed a plan for the annexation of a new bridge. A political study took a sample of 1000 voters in th

e town and found that 42% of the residents favored annexation. Using the data, a political strategist wants to test the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is more than 39%. Testing at the 0.02 level, is there enough evidence to support the strategist's claim?
Mathematics
1 answer:
garri49 [273]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

z=\frac{0.42 -0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.39(1-0.39)}{1000}}}=1.945  

p_v =P(Z>1.945)=0.0259  

If we compare the p value obtained with the significance level given \alpha=0.02 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of residents who favored annexation is not significantly higher than 0.39.  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

n=1000 represent the random sample taken

\hat p=0.42 estimated proportion of residents who favored annexation

p_o=0.39 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.02 represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is higher than 0.39:  

Null hypothesis:p\leq 0.39  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.39  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.42 -0.39}{\sqrt{\frac{0.39(1-0.39)}{1000}}}=1.945  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.02. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(Z>1.945)=0.0259  

If we compare the p value obtained with the significance level given \alpha=0.02 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of residents who favored annexation is not significantly higher than 0.39.  

You might be interested in
Polygon P'Q'R'S'T' shown on the grid below is an image of polygon PQRST after dilation with a scale factor of 3, keeping the ori
Allushta [10]

Answer:

D is the answer


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the midpoint between the two points (-7, -2) and (-7,2).<br><br>answer (?,?) <br><br>plz help​
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

(-7,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What percent of 30 is 18
Marina CMI [18]
18 is 60 percent of 30. 3 percent is 10 percent of 30 so 3 x 6 equals 18.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does anyone know the answer
alukav5142 [94]

676 out of 650 is 104%

7 0
2 years ago
The cumulative distribution function of a continuous random variable is the probability that the random variable X is greater th
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is False.

Step-by-step explanation:

The cumulative distribution function of a continuous random variable is the probability that the random variable X is less than or equal to x, where x is a specific value of the continuous random variable X.

The cumulative distribution function is a function that is usually derived from a continuous random variable. We actually calculate the area underneath a probability density function between two points.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jack is playing a game. When a player wins 3 consecutive games, the player receives 10 bonus points and then the player’s total
    9·1 answer
  • Carlisle has $1,200 in his piggy bank. The car he wants is a 2019 Dodge Charger costing $36,000. Carlisle works at Chipotle and
    8·2 answers
  • A baby blue whale weighed 3 ton at birth. Ten days later, it weighed 4 tons. Assuming the same rate of growth, which equation sh
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone show me how to do this I don’t just want the answer I need to know exactly how I can get the answer for my next prob
    14·1 answer
  • What does karyon, as used in prokaryote, mean
    11·1 answer
  • Scientists have increased their ability to make observations beyond their own senses through the invention of specialized equipm
    13·1 answer
  • A study of 2500 randomly selected students of a major university showed that 300 students tried to turn in work late to at least
    10·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP The table shows the amount of different colored paints in a bin in art class.Compare th
    7·2 answers
  • A recipe used 2/3 cup of sugar for every 2 teaspoons of butter. How much sugar was used per teaspoon of butter
    11·2 answers
  • The surface of Josh's desk measures 2.6 feet by 2.8 feet. What is the area of the desk?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!