R is 1 because in the table nothing has change.
Answer:
(attached file #2)
Step-by-step explanation:
let's change the variable n to a variable x (it can be x and y):
x ≥ -8
go to the X-axis which is the line going horizontal, just as the first picture attached!
2. Now go to the -8 on that line and draw a straight bold line going up (vertical)
and there you have the answer to the question.
if the question was with this symbol: < or > then the line would be dashed instead of being a bold solid straight line!
Hope this helps,
Lucas
<h3>
Answer: E) Not enough information</h3>
We're given two pairs of congruent sides, and a pair of congruent angles. The angles are not between the two congruent sides. So we don't have enough information to know if the triangles are congruent or not. SSA is not a valid congruence theorem. This is because there are some cases where two triangles are possible leading to ambiguity.
If the marked angles were between the tickmarked sides, then we could use SAS.
Answer:
Just solve the equation for g. You do this by moving all the g terms to one said and then getting the g term alone on that side.
a. 4.3g + 8 = 2.3g + 16
4.3g - 2.3g + 8 = 2.3g - 2.3g + 16 (Subtract 2.3g from both sides)
2g + 8 - 8 = 16 - 8 (Subtract 8 from both sides)
2g / 2 = 8 / 2 (Divide 2 from both sides)
g = 4
b. In order to check if your value is correct, simply substitute it in for g in the original equation
4.3(4) + 8 = 2.3(4) + 16
17.2 + 8 = 9.2 + 16
25.2 = 25.2
Since both sides are equal then our solution is correct. If the check didn't work, then we did our calculations wrong and need to redo it.
Step-by-step explanation: