This analysis asserts that Schlafly denounced the amendment because she believed it would attack the rights of housewives, give the federal government excessive power, and hurt women already equal before the law in the ways that mattered.
Answer:
Gender of campers
Explanation:
Confounding variable may be explained as a that variable which is unaccounted for in our experiment and goes on to cause a spurious relationship between the measured and predicted variables in the experiment. This is possible because the unaccounted for variable has a relationship between the variables which are being researched. Confounding variable here is the gender of campers, Using a certain capper gender to generalize on all campers will likely have a Confounding effect on our output as gender effect of the campers may differ.
The answer to this problem is the "prejudiced nondiscriminators". Based on Mr. Robert Merton's typology of prejudice anddiscriminationn, prejudiced nondiscriminators may have no personal prejudice but still engage in discrimnatory bahavior because of the peer-group pressure or economic, political r social interest. Mr. Robert Merton is a known sociologist and he was being recognized on all of his contributions in the field of sociology.
Answer:
C. applied unequally across states.
Explanation:
The case of Furman V. Georgia occured in 1972. At that time, most states did not necessarily 'Banned' the use of death penalty as a punishment. But the problems occurred because it seems that each states have different standard when determining which type of criminals should be sentenced with death penalty.
Example of the unequal application :
Furman was sentenced to death penalty because he killed someone during an attempted robbery. But criminals who convicted with the same charge in California at that time was punished with 25 years of prison time. Not death penalty.
