Answer:
D. So immigrants could learn about democracy
Explanation:
In the 19th century, there was the reformation of schooling in the US, lead by Horace Mann. <u>With this, </u><u>common or public schools</u><u> were promoted as one of the key services of the US.</u> These schools would be funded by tax money and would allow everyone the opportunity to schooling.
<u>One of the main reasons for this was to create educational opportunities for poor people and immigrants who did not have resources</u>. <u>The idea was to help immigrant children to accommodate to American culture and way of living. </u>Democracy was considered one of the main US ideas, and it was considered immigrants need to learn about it in order to adapt to the society and accept their American identity.
No because of the history between the two
Answer:
If I were to add something that would make my argument against slavery more convincing I would probably say something like what is the roles were switched, would you want to be a slave?
When people went to Africa or when they bought slaves they would often say something like it was in the bible and because of this that it was okay when this was not true so you could possibly use that to help your argument against it. There are probably better answers out there but I wrote a argument against slavery once and I used this stuff in and got a pretty good grade.
<span>Patriotism was high and men were eager to fight for justice and their country.</span>
<span>He restored the French Monarchy, Created the Edict of Nantes...Fam</span>
