Answer:
<u>Share of this stock worth today if the required rate of return is 7.6 percent is $3.59</u>
Explanation:
stock worth today = 2/1.076 + 2/1.076^2
stock worth today = $ 3.59
When a lender checks the credit score of Jason for an auto loan, they would most likely notice that <u>b. He </u><u>paid off </u><u>a</u><u> car loan </u><u>after making</u><u> every payment</u><u> for 4 years. </u>
Lenders checking credit scores:
- Usually pay more attention to related loans
- Only bother with the credit score of the person in question not their relatives
The loan is for a car or an automobile of some sort so the lender will be looking for related loans in Jason's history. They will therefore most likely notice the car loan that was paid off.
In conclusion, a lender for an auto loan will most likely notice an auto loan history.
Options for this question include:
a. His savings account has more than $3000 in it
b. He paid off a car loan after making every payment for 4 years
c. When he stopped paying his credit card for 3 months 9 years ago
d. The credit scores of his family, including his parents and his wife if he is married
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14805575. </em>
Answer: 4%
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Pension plan assets were $1,200 million at the beginning of the year and $1,252 million at the end of the year and that at the end of the year, retiree benefits paid by the trustee were $28 million and cash invested in the pension fund was $32 million.
Based on the above scenario, the percentage rate of return on plan assets goes thus:
Opening balance of plan assets 1200
Add:- Actual return = 48
Add:- contributions = 32
Less :- retiree benefits = -28
Closing balance of plan assets = 1252
It should be noted that the actual return is the balancing figure which is calculated as:
= 1252 + 28 - 1200 - 32
= 48
The percentage rate of return on plan assets will now be:
= 48/1200
=0.04
= 4%
"Miranda rights" require that police inform you that you have the right to remain silent, that anything you say can be against you in court, you have the right to have a lawyer present for questioning, and if you cannot afford a layer the court can appoint one for you.
