Answer:
valid.
Explanation:
Valid is something effective, legally binding or able to withstand objection.
In deductive reasoning, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. It is not required for a valid argument to have premises that are actually true, but to have premises that, if they were true, would guarantee the truth of the argument's conclusion. Valid arguments must be clearly expressed by means of sentences called well-formed formulas. The validity of an argument can be tested, proved or disproved, and depends on its logical form.
An argument is a set of statements expressing the premises and an evidence-based conclusion.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
States do have broad authority over the control and management of hazardous materials generated within their boarders because according to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1986 (CERCLA) section 104(0)(9), states are held liable for the treatment, management, effective transportation and disposal of hazardous waste generated within their boarders.
The answer is judge, because you tons of experience to even be able to apply
<em>Answer: Futility of discussion</em>
Explanation:
From the given case/scenario, we can state this is an example of futility of discussion. In this particular case , we've been given the information that Diba's conversation with her mother about about her curfew have been futile or in other words pointless. They haven't been able to come to a conclusion and thus have wasted time in pointless debate.
Answer:
"Many members of the organization made quilts as fundraisers to support their cause. They would also include words and pictures on quilts to raise awareness."
Explanation:
It is showing the uses of the quilt, as a fundraiser and as a way to spread awareness. That is multiple ways the quilt is used to support a certain cause.
