Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
When the function or the coefficient in this case 1/4x^2 is positive it means it's opening up like a u, meaning all the values will be bigger than the C term or -5 in this case.
The hypothesis test shows that we reject the null hypothesis and there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the return rate is less than 20%
<h3>What is the claim that the return rate is less than 20% by using a statistical hypothesis method?</h3>
The claim that the return rate is less than 20% is p < 0.2. From the given information, we can compute our null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis as:


Given that:
Sample size (n) = 6965
Sample proportion 
The test statistics for this data can be computed as:



z = -2.73
From the hypothesis testing, since the p < alternative hypothesis, then our test is a left-tailed test(one-tailed.
Hence, the p-value for the test statistics can be computed as:
P-value = P(Z ≤ z)
P-value = P(Z ≤ - 2.73)
By using the Excel function =NORMDIST (-2.73)
P-value = 0.00317
P-value ≅ 0.003
Therefore, we can conclude that since P-value is less than the significance level at ∝ = 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis and there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the return rate is less than 20%
Learn more about hypothesis testing here:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ1
Answer:
= -x+6
Step-by-step explanation:
we can simply substitute (x-4) in x place because when we say function of x , we are basically saying when we substitute a given value in the place of x we will find a given y.so for example if we have a question f(4), we can simply plug 4 to -x +2 so we will find y or f(x) = -2.
so the answer for the above question will be f(x)= -x +6.
Answer:
a. Life span increased
b. The median age could rise because of the improvement in medical technology. Also more advertisement of healthier life styles, such as eating healthy could have increase the median age.
c. No because this just shows the increase in life span not the decrease in children.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. more people on average lived longer lives. (explanation)
b. self explanatory I guess, my answer pretty much explained it.
c. life span of US citizens does not effect the children population. I guess you could say people lived longer lives to have more children, so possibly the number of children could have increased.
In slope intercept form this would just be: y=-3