1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vazorg [7]
4 years ago
12

After numerous campus interviews, Alex Sanchi, a student at BC, received two office interview invitations from the Orlando offic

es of two large firms. Both firms offered to cover her "out-of-pocket expenses" (travel, hotel, and meals). She scheduled the interviews for both firms on the same day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. At the conclusion of each interview, she submitted to both firms her total out-of-pocket expenses of $296 for mileage, hotel, meals, parking and tolls. She believes this approach is appropriate. If she had made two trips, her cost would have been two times $296. She is also certain that neither firm knew she had visited the other on that same trip. Within ten days Alex received two checks in the mail, each in the amount of $296.Did Alex handle the situation properly? If not what should she have done?
Business
2 answers:
natali 33 [55]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Situation was not handled properly.

Interviews would have been scheduled for different days

Explanation:

Doubling bills is an un-ethical act of charging two different clients for the same time working while in reality the actual cost of time spent for each client is less than the bill submitted.This violates the law of professional conduct.

Alex's idea of submitting two different daily expenses  to the two firms for  interviews attended on the same day is double billing , which might attract fines or other punishments if discovered .

It would have been better if she scheduled the interviews on different days so far each of the firms are willing to cover the expenses.

JulsSmile [24]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

She should have been honest and transparent about the interviews to both potential employers.

Explanation:

A good working relationship is based on trust, honesty and ethical behavior from both the potential employee and employer. Alex, being dishonest at the beginning of a potential relationship, may ruin the chances of having that relationship. If either of her potential employers found out, she would be labelled as unethical and may face legal action for using funds from one firm to attend an interview of another. The honest action would have been to set different days (consecutive) and informed both that she would be there for both days and for what. This would have benefited her as well as it would have allowed her some time to prepare for the next interview.

A good member of any team is honest, trustworthy and reliable, among other traits.

You might be interested in
The probability of a loss occurring can be reduced by
shutvik [7]
The probability of a loss occurring can be reduced my loss prevention
8 0
4 years ago
Refer to exhibit 4-5. if a free market were allowed in the transplanted kidney market, then the equilibrium price would be p2. t
Aneli [31]

Answer:

(q2 - q1)

Explanation:

I have uploaded the picture the question refers to below.

We can see that under a price ceiling of $0, the quantity of kidneys supplied is Q1, and if the price ceiling is removed, and the market is allowed to reach equilibrium, the new quantity of kidneys supplied is Q2, so the increase in the supply of transplanted kidneys can be found by the formula (q2 - q1)

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following designs safety regulations?
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

the right answer is A.

Explanation:

because Those responsible for ensuring the health and safety of their workers are the professionals who study the regulation of these standards

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The P/E ratio for a certain stock was high. This means _____.
Lerok [7]

Answer:

Number 4. I just did this on odyssey ware

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Slotnick Chemical received $230,000 from customers as deposits on returnable containers during 2018. Ten percent of the containe
sesenic [268]

Answer:

$20,909.09

Explanation:

We have been given that Slotnick Chemical received $230,000 from customers as deposits on returnable containers during 2018. 10% of the containers were not returned. The deposits are based on the container cost marked up 10%.

The price after mark-up would be 100\%+10\%=110\%

To find the profit on the forfeited deposits, we will divide $230,000 times 10% by 110% as:

\text{Profit on the forfeited deposits}=\frac{\$230,000\times 10\%}{110\%}

\text{Profit on the forfeited deposits}=\frac{\$230,000}{11}

\text{Profit on the forfeited deposits}=\$20,909.0909

\text{Profit on the forfeited deposits}\approx \$20,909.09

Therefore, Slotnick realize a profit of $20,909.09 on the forfeited deposits.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • unland Company has the following data: direct labor $238,000, direct materials used $199,000, total manufacturing overhead $248,
    11·1 answer
  • Coyne Corporation is evaluating a capital investment opportunity. This project would require an initial investment of $ 39 comma
    11·1 answer
  • You are given the following information: Stockholders' equity as reported on the firm’s balance sheet = $4 billion, price/earnin
    15·1 answer
  • Anne Mullens is the bookkeeper for DWG Refrigeration Repair. One afternoon while she was preparing the bank deposit, a customer
    6·1 answer
  • A division of IBM works out of 360 locations in 64 countries, tracking more than 1.5 million assets for both IBM and its clients
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose a bank does NOT hold any excess reserves (it loans all available reserves) and the reserve ratio is 20%. If Melanie depo
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best definition of a minimum payment on a credit card?
    7·1 answer
  • Interview Notes Pat and Terri are married and want to file a joint return. Pat is a U.S. citizen and has a valid Social Security
    15·1 answer
  • If a product's demand rises as income rises, ceteris paribus, the product is
    7·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpts and comment on the discussion question:
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!