1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sveta_85 [38]
3 years ago
8

What conclusion can you draw about military rule in Latin American countries?

History
2 answers:
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
7 0
1. moved away from import substitution
2. poverty and inequality
3. military leaders took harsh steps to maintain their control
4. to promote economic cooperation
5. military regime
6. by backing anti-communist military regimes
7. a growing income gap
8. peron took steps to silence political opposition
9. American intervention did not result in more democratic governments
10. party bosses repressed political opposition
11. numerous latin American nations and the us joined together
12. nonviolent civic protesters
Art [367]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D. Military leaders took harsh steps to maintain their control.

Explanation:

All throughout the second half of the 20th century, most Latin American countries suffered through several military governments that were not democratically elected, most notably in the case of Chile where Pinochet, with the help of the USA, overthrew the democratically elected president, Salvador Allende. Every country that suffered this kind of rule experienced harsh governmental controls —where opposing individuals faced often even death— that made this governments long-lasting and extremely detrimental to their societies and economies, effects which, in many cases, like in Brazil, are felt even to this day.  

You might be interested in
Which view was NOT part of Montesquieu’s conception of the separation of powers in The Spirit of the Laws (1748)? A. The two hou
Slav-nsk [51]
The answer to this question would be A.  Montesquieu believed in separation of powers. There should be three branches and each branch should be able to "check" the other. No branch would have more power than the others. The two houses of legislature would be able to block bills introduced by the president, while the president can veto any bills he found improper that were drafted by the legislative branch. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the phenomenon of Free Blacks owning slaves in antebellum times. Read the following articles. Give your opinions and the
Igoryamba

Answer:

    Free blacks throughout the antebellum period, which encompassed the years from the creation of the Union until the Civil War, were vocal in their opposition to slavery's injustice. In terms of their ability to express themselves, their location in the North or the South was a determining factor. Free Southern blacks continued to live under the shadow of slavery, unable to move or congregate as freely as those in the North, despite their freedom from slavery. Additionally, it was more difficult for them to create and maintain churches, schools, and fraternal organizations like as the Masons during this time period.

    Despite the fact that their lives were restricted by a slew of discriminatory regulations even during the colonial period, freed African Americans, particularly those living in the North, were active participants in the life of the country. Black troops served in the American Revolution and the War of 1812, and many of them were African-American. Some had land, residences, businesses, and were required to pay taxes. For brief periods of time in some Northern cities, black property owners were able to cast ballots. Slaves were owned by a very tiny number of free blacks. The slaves that the majority of free blacks purchased were relatives who were eventually manumitted by their masters. Slave holding plantations in Louisiana, Virginia, and South Carolina were owned by a small number of free blacks.

Explanation:

Add your own opinion of text above, hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
W Help
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

Hey There! ^^

Patrick Henry was a firm believer in “clean” governments and refused to accept corruption among Government officials. Henry’s fervent beliefs on Government actions greatly augmented a unifying uprising against British rule.

Explanation:

Happy to Help! ^^

7 0
3 years ago
From 1870 to 1910, the number of domestic servants was
Lilit [14]

Answer:

increasing.

Explanation:

coz tne number of domestic servant

6 0
3 years ago
Why were the articles of confederation replaced with the constitution quizlet.
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

The need for a stronger central government.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What prediction can a reader make when a phrase such as tortoise and turtle is used several times in a passage's first lines?
    5·2 answers
  • What two far-reaching international events took place in 1789?
    6·2 answers
  • Trade brought wealth to a culture. In 100 to 150 words, write about at least two advancements that wealth brought to ancient Egy
    9·2 answers
  • What isthe supreme law” of the US?
    8·2 answers
  • In order to invade Russia and get to Stalingrad, the Germans had to move
    14·2 answers
  • Please fully explain the 3/5 Compromise
    6·1 answer
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
    8·1 answer
  • When Houston took office, Texas owed $1,25 million, to
    10·1 answer
  • Paleo-Indians groups spread __________ throughout North America.
    6·1 answer
  • March all that apply: History.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!