According to social judgment theory, <u>the judgmental anchor</u> is the person's actual or preferred position.
A framework for studying human judgement is called social judgement theory. It is a meta-theory that guides study on cognitive perspective, or how one interprets the world. A contrast effect is likely to occur when a stimulus is further from one's judging anchor, while an assimilation effect may occur when the stimulus is close to the anchor, according to the underlying psychophysical principle.
The social judgement theory represents an effort to apply the findings and psychophysical principles of judgement to social judgement. SJT is a theory that primarily concentrates on a person's internal processes of their own judgement in relation to the relation inside a communicated message, using the person's chosen viewpoint as the judgmental anchor. The idea was to describe the conditions under which persuasive communications had the best chance of working.
To learn more about social judgment theory here,
brainly.com/question/15118669
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: read the novel aloud and discuss it with the students who struggle
When readers struggle to read they are very likely to stop reading it and making an opinion that the writing is bad and does not make sense. By making them read in group setting the readers would most likely realize why they do not understand it and it open up opportunities for exchange of opinion and idea among the group.
Answer:
freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of preamble, freedom of assembly, freedom to protest.
Explanation:
there's more, just search up the constitution on the internet tbh
Answer:
2 Rapidly increasing
Explanation:
More people are being born and less are dying creating a population that is increasing!
2 plantation system of the Caribbean
