Answer:
double-barreled question
Explanation:
A double-barreled question is a question that comprises two or more topics or issues , but is expected to have just one answer. A double barreled question is sometimes referred to as an informal fallacy. It also be called a double-direct question or compound question. It is usually advisable to avoid such questions in survey, but can be used in court during cross examination or other researches.
For example the question above touches on two separate issues: the use of reinforcement and the use of punishment at the same time, by parents, as a means to increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their children. Stacy found it difficult to answer this question because it is a double-barreled question.
Answer:
Explanation:
9. c) unemployment rate is high
<h3>
NOTE : Actually I have a doubt in the second question either it is first option nor second </h3>
10. a) based the economy solely on oil production or investment in infrastructure
Many hydra reproduce asexually by producing buds in the body wall, which grow to be miniature adults and simply break away when they are mature. when a hydra is well fed, a new bud can form every two days.
A person is participating in partial hospitalization when he/she is being treated for schizophrenia and goes each day to a center where the focus is on improving social skills and receiving therapy. Partial hospitalization provides a program for outpatient psychiatric services. This is more intense than the care given by a doctor. Likewise, this treatment is given during the day and does not require the patient to stay overnight.
<span> </span>
Explanation:
Lex talionis means treating the criminals in the way the criminals treated the victims. In means giving the same sufferings to others as others have caused them suffering.
This principle is not plausible because according to Nathanson, it will make us to act in an immoral way with others. We cannot hijack the hijacker's plane because they did to us. We cannot spy on others because others are spying on us. Nathanson objected the principle because he believes that it is not possible to measure sufferings of others as different people suffered differently. So we cannot bring equal suffering.
