Answer:
The correct answer is ''According to the information-processing theorists, <u>the brain structures involved in memory</u> refers to the hardware, whereas <u>learned memory strategies</u> refers to the software of the human memory system.''
Explanation:
The hardware is the structure that gives physical support to the computer while the software is the operational support. The similarities between the brain and the computer are reduced to that both are used for the storage and processing of information and to execute tasks. Memory can be defined as the coding, storage and evocation of the traces of experience that allow the human to accumulate information and knowledge. The necessary brain structures in the coding of information are the prefrontal and para-hippocampal region in storage the hippocampus and diencephalon, and in the evocation the frontal lobe.
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>
...it is hard to believe that it could ever
Answer:
The more power the empire inherits, they often become blind sighted when it comes to making the right decisions. The higher up in the ranks, the more privilege you receive, the lower in the ranks you are, you often receive neglect. The oblivious leaders are eventually overthrown by their people, or often times citizens created fights among each other.
Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
Groupthink: The groupthink theory was originally proposed by the works of Irving Janis in 1972.
The term groupthink is considered as a psychological phenomenon that arises in a specific group consisting various people that desires or wants conformity or harmony in that particular group and often results in a dysfunctional or an irrational decision-making process or outcome.
Groupthink occurs due to the faulty or wrong decision made by the members of a group due to the need of being the group intact.
Your answer should be - because they believed the Constitution was the best way to balance these needs
Hope that helps
