I guess the correct answer is the narrow view, or invisible hand theory
.
The narrow view, or invisible hand theory, holds that producing profit is more important than being socially responsible.
Answer:
A lot of information is missing, but the answer is the same whether we are told about a specific case or not. If the US Supreme Court decided on a similar case that is under trial in Nebraska, the Nebraska court must follow the decision and guidelines of the US Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the US, and its decisions must be followed by all lower courts. If a lower court doesn't follow a Supreme Court decision on a similar case, then an appellate court would reverse the decision.
The Supreme Court does not create laws, but it decides on how they should be enforced.
Answer:
2.12, rounded up to 3
Explanation:
To solve the equation, we first need to set up an equation.
Let x represent the number of scarves. We want one side of the equation to be the amount earned and the other to be the cost
45x is how much they earn since each scarf is $45
70+12x is how much they cost for rent and production
45x=70+12x
Subtract 12x from both sides
33x=70
Divide both sides by 33
x=2.12
It says we should round up so 3 scarves to break even
What are the options, sir?
Ethical usually means what is right, or morally right. For example, killing someone isn't ethical, but helping an elderly person up from falling would be the ethical thing to do.
Answer: shifter discovers a loss of $3000
Explanation:
Because Shifter paid $5,000 more for the treasury stock than its fair value: 1,000 shares × ($20 − $15). The $2,000 fee (1,000 × $2) offsets that loss yielding a net loss of $3,000
