The width of a rectangle is four less than half the length

Which number(s) is a whole number, but not a natural number?

Anna [14]

Answer:

number 0

Step-by-step explanation:

The number 0 is a whole number but not a natural number. But we can say that natural numbers contain all the whole numbers except the number 0.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

HELP ASAP I DONT GET IT ITS DUE IN 14 MINS

Oksanka [162]

Answer:

110.5 i think D

Step-by-step explanation:

just me doing work vvvvv

65 + 45.5 = 110.5

---

7 x 6.5

45.5

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify the domain of the function. A) [0,5) B) (0,5) [-4,4) D) (-4, 4]

Rama09 [41]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:A

7 0

3 years ago

Alguien me puede ayudar en este problema plis

Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Not Answered Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal f

ehidna [41]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

$z=\frac{0.410-0.350}{\sqrt{0.382(1-0.382)(\frac{1}{1000}+\frac{1}{900})}}=2.688$

$p_v =2*P(Z>2.688)= 0.0072$

Comparing the p value with the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the proportions analyzed are significantly different at 5% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=410$ represent the number of people indicating that their financial security was more than fair in 2012

$X_{2}=315$ represent the number of people indicating that their financial security was more than fair in 2010

$n_{1}=1000$ sample 1 selected

$n_{2}=900$ sample 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{410}{1000}=0.410$ represent the proportion estimated of people indicating that their financial security was more than fair in 2012

$p_{2}=\frac{315}{900}=0.350$ represent the proportion estimated of people indicating that their financial security was more than fair in 2010

$\hat p$ represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level given

Part a: Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference between the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

Hypothesis testing

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{410+315}{1000+900}=0.382$

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.410-0.350}{\sqrt{0.382(1-0.382)(\frac{1}{1000}+\frac{1}{900})}}=2.688$

Statistical decision

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z>2.688)= 0.0072$

Comparing the p value with the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the proportions analyzed are significantly different at 5% of significance.

3 0

4 years ago