Answer:
A. can afford to take on additional risk; increases
Explanation:
Saying that Risk and Return go hand in hand, tells us that you <u>can afford to take additional risk </u> as the length of the investment horizon <u>increases</u>. Increasing the length of the investment horizon increases the ability to take on additional risk because in the long run the investment pays off while it may be choppy in the short time horizon.
Answer:
$66,667
Explanation:
Contribution margin = Sales Revenue - Variable cost = 240000-60000 = 180000
Percentage of contribution margin = Contribution margin / sales revenue = 180000 / 240000 = 75%
Breakevent point in total sales = Fixed costs / Percentage of contribution margin
= 50000/0.75 = $66,667
Answer:
C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.
Explanation:
During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.
Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.
Answer:
Option 1 is more convenient.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The annual salary is $100,000. You are offered two options for a severance package. Option 1 pays you 6 months' salary now. Option 2 pays you and your heirs $6,000 per year forever
The present value of option 1 is:
PV= 6*100,000= $600,000
To calculate the present value of option 2 we need to use the present value formula of a perpetual annuity:
PV= Cash flow/i
PV= 6,000/0.11= $54,545
There is no doubt that option 1 is better.