Answer:
reported as a current asset on the balance sheet.
Explanation:
According to US GAAP, inventory must be reported at lower of cost or market value. ⇒ Therefore, "generally valued at the price for which the goods can be sold." is wrong.
Inventory is included under current assets since it is considered relatively liquid. ⇒ Therefore, "reported under the classification of Property, Plant, and Equipment on the balance sheet." is wrong.
Inventory is not an expense, cost of goods sold is an expense account. ⇒ Therefore, "reported as a miscellaneous expense on the income statement." is wrong.
Answer:
The amount of $4.8 million will be reported as current liabilities on 31 December 2018 and the amount of $14.4 will be reported as long term liabilities.
Explanation:
The current liabilities are the short term liabilities or obligations that a business is expected to pay or settle within a year's time period. The long term liabilities, on the other hand, are the liabilities or obligations which are due to be paid any time more than a year.
The outstanding amount on Note Payable on 31 December 2018 after the first repayment will be, 24 - 4.8 = $19.2 million
Out of the $19.2 million that is outstanding, $4.8 million are to be paid on 31 December 2019 that is within a year. Thus, this amount will be reported as a current liability as it is payable within a one year period.
The remaining amount of 19.2 - 4.8 = $14.4 million will be reported as a non current liability as it is payable after more than a year from today.
Answer:
III only.
Cultural attitudes toward antitrust law differ.
Explanation:
Competition law is an area of law that seeks to maintain a level playing field for all participants in an industry by protecting them against anti-competitive conduct by companies.
For example two major players in an industry may collaborate to raise price of goods.
However in foreign competition law we have to consider that cultural attitudes towards antitrust law differs. What is accepted in one country may not apply in another. So there is absence of litigation when considering competition in the foreign scene.
Answer:
Option D US consumers lose more from tariffs than U.S. producers gain
Explanation:
The reason is that the US has imposed tariffs on the import of goods to overcome the comparative advantage of the other countries. So by imposing tariffs the US producer's products become inexpensive and protects them from the foreign countries with comparative advantage in similar products. This means the US consumer is buying expensive products and don't motivates the US producer to invest in efficiency and that the size of the industry may be at the growth stage or the producer's size is very small which means it can not compete with the competitors in the international market. So as a result the US consumer suffer more because they pay higher payments and are forced to buy expensive American products which is less in value to the consumer than the value it generates to the producers.