Answer:
A.) ALPHA
Portfolio A = 8.5%
Portflio B = 13.5%
B.) Sharpe measure
Portfolio A = 0.1519
Portflio B = 0.1479
Explanation:
T- bill rate (Rf) =5%
S&P 500 index ( Rm) = 10%
Portfolio A;
Expected rate of return = 9.1%
Beta (B) = 0.7
Standard deviation (s) = 27%
Portfolio B;
Expected rate of return = 12.1%
Beta (B) = 1.7
Standard deviation = 48%
Required rate of return for both portfolios;
Rf + B × (Rm - Rf)
Portfolio A :
5% + 0.7 ×(10% - 5%) = 5% + 0.7 × (5%)
5% + 3.5% = 8.5%
Portfolio B :
5% + 1.7 ×(10% - 5%) = 5% + 1.7 × (5%)
5% + 8.5% = 13.5%
A) Alpha(A) of Portfolio A and B ;
A = Expected return - Required return
Alpha of portfolio A :
9.1% - 8.5% = 0.6%
Alpha of Portfolio B:
12.1% - 13.5% = - 1.4%
B.) Sharpe measure for portfolio A and B;
Sharpe ratio = (Expected rate of return - Rf) / s
Portfolio A = (9.1% - 5%)/27% = 0.1519
Portfolio B = (12.1% - 5%)/48% = 0.1479
I will choose Portfolio A
Based on the amount of debt and equity that Little LampLighter has, the weighted average rate of return would be 12.3%.
<h3>What is the weighted average rate of return?</h3>
First find the total value of debt and equity:
= 10 + 25
= $35 million
The weighted average return is:
= (10 / 35 x 8%) + (25 / 35 x 14%)
= 2.286% + 10%
= 12.3%
Find out more on weighted average rate of return at brainly.com/question/17284158.
#SPJ12
Answer:
$48 million
Explanation:
In this scenario, we compare the values between book value including goodwill and the fair value of machinery, the difference would be the loss on impairment of the asset
In mathematically,
= Book value including goodwill - fair value
= $450 million - $402 million
= $48 million
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
Moral decision
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is the notion of ethics that is an action is considered good if it results in the greatest good of all the others. It considers the single action and decided on that basis whether the certain thing is right or wrong. The utility increases at one particular action and when the other action arrives its utility diminishes. It does not show the moral decision that has been taken for the other reasons.
Answer:
B) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question his attitude change is best explained by cognitive dissonance. This is defined as the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change. Which is exactly what Fernando is experiencing.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
