9%, as the unadjusted rate of return is equal to the average yearly net income growth rate divided by the initial investment's net cost.
<h3>Calculation:</h3>
$40,090 divided by $430,00 is.093 * 100, or 9%.
<h3>If the needed rate of return is 6%, what is the present value of a cash inflow of $2,000 five years from now? Examine later?</h3>
$2600 will be given to the recipient after five years.
<h3>If the internal rate of return is 5% and the desired rate of return is 6%, should management accept the investment opportunity?</h3>
No, as the internal rate of return on the investment is lower than the intended rate of return.
To know more about unadjusted rate visit:-
brainly.com/question/13037420
#SPJ4
Answer:
The most suitable answer is Stocks may help you protect your money from inflation while bonds may be more susceptible to losing their value over time due to inflation.
Explanation:
Now remember, this is not "guaranteed" as stocks come with higher risks comparing to bonds, yet in US share market, stocks have performed well than the bonds overall. This is because stock prices fluctuate and if the company invested in is performing well, the share prices can sky rocket over a long period while in bonds you don't see this often as they are issued for a specific time and represents the debt capital.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": product extension.
Explanation:
In International Business, product extension refers to the approach by which a firm introduces its product or service across borders without shaping the product according to the profile of each consumer in each region. Product extension is implemented to expand the business operations of a firm in an attempt of finding new consumers in new markets, thus, generating more profit.
<em>Product extension is likely to work only if customers' preferences and necessities are the same in different countries.</em>
Investing <span>is riskier but has the potential for a higher rate of return</span>
I think the answer is in the middle
