Answer: With a loss
Explanation:
The firm here has its Marginal cost higher than it's marginal revenue.
This means that for every additional unit sold, the company is incurring a loss of $0.50 which is the difference between the marginal cost and the marginal revenue.
The company is therefore operating at a loss because every additional unit is costing them instead of benefitting them. To counter this, they need to reduce production so that marginal cost will fall.
Answer:
$15 per backpack
Explanation:
The average variable cost per of producing a backpack by using the high low method is shown below:
Variable cost per backpack = (High total cost - low total cost) ÷ (High backpack produced - low backpack produced )
= ($110,000- $87,500) ÷ (4,000 backpack produced - 2,500 backpack produced )
= $22,500 ÷ 1,500 backpack produced
= $15 per backpack
Answer:
To ,
The Concern specialists/Editor/Citizens
Subject: To Generate Cash for social assistance right now tempest and debacle .
Dear partners ,
We are confronting an incredible test to loss of our home and harms to our infrastructural improvement . As, I am another business visionary . I wish to contribute cash to greatest individuals with the goal that they can fix their home. This can not be conceivable without your important commitment and backing. I demand each resident , understudies, clients of treats, specialists and so forth to contribute wilfully at all you wish to do right now cause and at the hour of crisis.
Looking for your gifts and an important commitment.
Yours Sincerely,
SALLY
Proprietor AND SOLE PROPRIETOR
CALIFORNIA COOKIES
USA
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases
