Answer:
I think the answer is
no
no?
yes
yes
yes
no
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not really sure if this is correct but from my textbook it says that the answer cannot have a math problem in it (E.g x = 1 + 2.3).
I am sorry if this is incorrect
If it is correct, can I have brainliest please?
a) Sammie earns
£320×4% = £12.80
each year.
Joel earns
£420×3% = £12.60
each year.
Sammie earns the most interest.
b) Joel's interest after 5 years is
£12.60×5 = £63
so the total amount of money Joel will have is
£420 +63 = £483
The Choice D is the best answer by the passage because it most clearly and concisely combines the sentences using the correct punctuation. This choice eliminates unnecessary words, and the commas are placed correctly between the clauses.
According to the statement
we have to find that the out of given options which is correct for replace the words in the passage.
So, For this purpose, we know that the
In the passage ,
Choice A is incorrect because the phrase “the result being that it” is wordy and could be replaced with the single word “which.” Choice B is incorrect because the words “algal blooms cause oxygen depletion” need not be repeated. Choice C is incorrect because there is unnecessary repetition of the words “oxygen depletion” and “algal blooms.”
So, The Choice D is the best answer by the passage because it most clearly and concisely combines the sentences using the correct punctuation. This choice eliminates unnecessary words, and the commas are placed correctly between the clauses.
Learn more about passage here
brainly.com/question/12555695
#SPJ4
Play usually continues 7.Qf3+ Ke6 8.Nc3 (see diagram). Black will play 8...Nb4 or 8...Ne7 and follow up with c6, bolstering his pinned knight on d5. If Black plays 8...Nb4, White can force the b4 knight to abandon protection of the d5 knight with 9.a3?! Nxc2+ 10.Kd1 Nxa1 11.Nxd5, sacrificing a rook, but current analysis suggests that the alternatives 9.Qe4, 9.Bb3 and 9.O-O are stronger. White has a strong attack, but it has not been proven yet to be decisive.
Because defence is harder to play than attack in this variation when given short time limits, the Fried Liver is dangerous for Black in over-the-board play, if using a short time control. It is also especially effective against weaker players who may not be able to find the correct defences. Sometimes Black invites White to play the Fried Liver Attack in correspondence chess or in over-the-board games with longer time limits (or no time limit), as the relaxed pace affords Black a better opportunity to refute the White sacrifice.
