1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amanda [17]
3 years ago
5

Why would a monarch ordered his army to suppress an uprising in another country?

History
1 answer:
marishachu [46]3 years ago
7 0
.A monarch order his army to suppress an uprising in another country because <span>frequently, big rebellions and revolutions are the basis of uproar in every part of the world and the monarch possibly desired to discontinue the rebellions before his countrymen uprisings are no longer in control</span>
You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes changes in the population of Washington over the last 200
Darya [45]
9. I believe is A. 10. I believe is C. And 11. I believe isD.
6 0
3 years ago
Why did Amenhotep take away priests authority?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

He used his ability to reduce the power of the priests of Amun, who got their power from their tight connection to Amun-Re.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What three explanations have been given for the collapse of the Mayan civilization
arsen [322]
1 reason is that King Ashoka dies, and the Mayan empire crumbles

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best
victus00 [196]
Answer is b how I just know
5 0
2 years ago
According to Rousseau, how does a man keep his freedom under a government created by the Social Contract? please answer :'(
charle [14.2K]

The answer is inferred in the last paragraph.  When it says "each man, in giving his freedom to all, gives his freedom to no one" means that if we all have the power of decision we all have to consent to a specific outcome or solution together. No one has more power than the otherone.   If our wishes align with the desires of the majority of people we have the possibility of those demands or expectations to be fulfilled.  Because of that, is in the contract with others where we can maintain, as better as possible, our personal freedom.

On the contrary, if there is just one person in power, for example, the king, <em>his will would be the one being made without taking into account what the subordinates might think or want</em>. In monarchies, if the king ordered someone to do something, they had to do it regardless of what they preferred. In those cases, individual freedom was completly coerced.

To sum up,  the power to set and change the rules of society is dispersed among all people in a society ruled by the social contract idea.  By sharing the power among everyone the individual maintains its freedom better than when the power is held by a single ruler that withholds all of it.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the stamp act so devastating to the economy of the colonists?​
    9·1 answer
  • Analyzing What was the most important purpose of the pyramids? Explain your reasoning.
    15·1 answer
  • Which two of these events directly led to the beginning of europeen explorers
    12·1 answer
  • How was popular culture changing and reflecting america?
    13·1 answer
  • What does roosevelt believe America’s role in the world should be
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a factor that could lead to economic growth? a. labor c. land b. capital d. opportunity cost
    10·2 answers
  • Which beliefs apply to followers of Judaism? Check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • Do you have to have justice to have freedom or do you have to have freedom to have justice?
    13·2 answers
  • In which population would you expect disease to spread more quickly?
    15·1 answer
  • Write a poem using each letter from the word Apartheid
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!