The United States has had several issues in following Washington's advice in his Farewell Address. For example, avoiding the creation of political parties is one piece of advice that we ignored. Avoiding political parties would be an extremely difficult task. Political parties give individuals the ability to work with other citizens who share a similar set of core beliefs and values. When several individuals feel strongly about a subject, it is common for them to create an organization or affiliation geared towards that goal.
Avoiding permanent foreign alliances is also a difficult task in today's world. There are several different organizations that revolve around foreign alliances that are critical to the safety of the world (example: United Nations). These alliances allow benefit the US economy, as it allows for trade that benefits the American consumer.
Overproduction by factories is the answer, for anyone else wondering :D
They only allowed blacks to buy houses in certain areas.
We are accustomed to a capitalist economy, good communication and transportation, and to solving our problems at the state or national level, so we tend to think that decentralized authority is primitive and ineffective. This is not necessarily so, and feudalism is not completely foreign to American society. Let me try to discuss feudalism from three different aspects. The paragraphs in bold will provide the sort of discussion that you are likely to find in the average college textbook; those in regular print will provide some idea of the historical conditions under which the feudal organization of society arose; and those in red will discuss the growth of an example of American feudalism with which most of you are familiar, if only through films and TV.
The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
