Answer:
Contribution per unit of scare resource (in hour) = $24 per hour
Explanation:
The question falls under the limiting factor analysis
<em>When a business is faced with a problem of shortage of a resource which can be used to produced more than one product type, to maximize the use of the resource , the business should allocate it for production purpose in such a way that </em><em>it maximizes the contribution per unit of the scare resource.</em>
Therefore Santario Company should allocate the machine hours to maximize the contribution per unit of machine hour.
Contribution per unit of scare resource is determine as follows:
Contribution per unit of scare resource for Model K-3
Contribution per unit of Model K-3 = $6
Machine time per unit = 15 minutes
<em>Contribution per unit of scare resource in minutes</em>
=Contribution per unit/Machine time per unit
= 46/15 minutes
= $0.4 per minute
Contribution per unit of scare resource (in hour)
$0.4 per minutes× 60
= $24 per hour
Answer:
correct option is $0
Explanation:
given data
purchased truck = $270,000
transportation and calibration costs = $30,000
life = 20 years
financed period = 15 year
solution
we know here that some expenses like insurance and depreciation etc is allocated by systematic and the rational procedure for some period
so that during that period related asset is expected to provide the benefit
and acquisition of capital asset is not record as expenses
we know appropriate property and plant or the equipment assets account are debit on purchases
so that Depreciation expenses are recorded to reflect the allocation of costs of the asset to operation over service life of assets
so here correct option is $0
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
GANTT refers to a chart that was developed by Henry L. Gantt, who was an american engineer and a social scientist, and is thus named after him. This chart is used to describe and illustrate various scheduled activities and the duration that each activity might take to complete. There is no full form for this word "GANTT". Therefore, the statement is false.
I don’t understand what you are trying to say or what your question is?
Remark
If Jenny takes option A by a month later between people's problems and her late nights working, she's going to be completely worn out, but her student loan will begin to get paid off. That's a plus.
If she takes B she does not get the career fulfillment that she wants. No job is perfect and that student loan is like a massive weight around her neck. She could do volunteer work on the weekends.
C is completely out of the question. She's piling debt on debt. If she meets with one of life's catastrophes, she will be in real trouble. C is not an option at all.
D
D to me is an option. Working with kids, she will discover, is career advancement enough. If she get's tenure, she's set.
Based on just what is in the question and nothing more, I would pick D. If you are allowed to add circumstances then B is a good choice. Depends on what kind of questions you had before. I'll stick with D, but it depends on what your marker is like. A machine is merciless and expects only one answer. A person might let you say something and give you credit for what you say.
D<<<< answer.
