Explain how the carbon cycle might be affected if we increased the extraction rate of fossil fuels.

2 answers:

6 0

Answer: Carbon cycle will be disturbed if there will be more extraction of fossil fuels. It takes thousand of years to form fossil fuels and there is a balance maintained in the nature which will be disturbed.

Explanation: If the amount of degradation of the fossil fuel will be more than the amount of synthesis then sooner or later there will be a deficiency of resources.

To maintain an ecological balance the amount of extraction of fossil fuels should be limited.

vitfil [10]2 years ago

4 0

More carbon would be released into the air with the burning of more fossil fuels and the environment would not be able to process the extra carbon.<span />

You might be interested in

I need help ASPPPPP!!!!

Serjik [45]

Answer:

sorry dude I also need this answer

Explanation:

please let me know if you get it

5 0

2 years ago

Fossils help scientists classify extinct species and determine their relationship to current species. Fossils provides What info

Savatey [412]

Fossils can provide the time a species existed through carbon-14 dating, and can also show structures within the species that are similar to other organisms on earth today or other organisms before/slightly after that fossils existence.

3 0

2 years ago

Working in a meat factory packaging and shipping the meat deliveries falls into which agricultural cluster?

Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

food products and processing systems

Explanation:

It has nothing to do with Agriculture (plants)

It has to do with food

Nothing to do with power, structure, or technology

5 0

2 years ago

You are determining the mass of an object using a triple beam balance. When the pointer is lined up with the zero mark, the ride

Nadusha1986 [10]

The mass of the object is the sum of the masses which shows the riders:
m = 300.00 g + 20.00 g + 8.00 g
m = 328.00 g
Answer:
The mass of the object is 328.00 grams.

3 0

2 years ago

Gene testing is foolproof since it scans the building blocks of humans. Please select the best answer from the choices provided.

Harrizon [31]

False

reason -

Gene testing is not full proof as there are possibilities of discrepancies in it based on the testing procedures used and the condition of sample. Since we human beings have the same genomic structure there are chances that our DNA may match with other people who do not share a heredity with our family. Basically statistical probability is used to determine probability of paternity, relationship of any kind etc. among two individuals . usually A 99% or higher percentage of probability is considered conclusive. and thus it gene testing can not be considered as full proof

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers