1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
3 years ago
12

In the speech just before jerome's, the speaker covered some of the same material that jerome was going to use in his speech on

golf. instead of letting this throw him, jerome acknowledged the overlap in his introduction. was this a wise thing to do,?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
3 0

<em>Yes, it was a very wise thing to do.</em> Whenever we create new content that we want to present to the public, we have to acknowledge any other material that might contain similar information to ours. Sometimes, this might happen on purpose, like when we research a topic and we find information in other sources that will enhance our research. In this case, we cite our sources as references.

In the case of Jerome, the overlap was accidental. However, if he is aware of it, it is still a good strategy to acknowledge it for several reasons.

Listeners will be aware of the overlap, so they will be less likely to accuse him of plagiarism (claiming another person’s idea are our own).

They will also be more patient with redundant information, instead of getting bored.

It will show that Jerome cares about the proper acknowledgement of sources of information, so they are more likely to trust the rest of his speech.

Finally, the audience is aware of the fact that Jerome could not have predicted this overlap, so they will appreciate his resourcefulness for having a strategy to work around it.


You might be interested in
In classical conditioning, the neutral stimulus becomes the _____ after conditioning. (Chapter 2) Group of answer choices CS UCS
ra1l [238]

In classical conditioning, the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus after conditioning.

<h3><u>What is classical conditioning?</u></h3>
  • Classical conditioning is a behavioral technique in which a biologically powerful stimulus (such food) is combined with a previously neutral stimulus.
  • It is sometimes referred to as Pavlovian conditioning or responder conditioning (e.g. a bell).
  • It also describes the process of learning that follows this pairing, in which the neutral stimulus eventually learns to elicit a response (such as salivation) that is typically similar to the one induced by the powerful stimulus.
  • Operant conditioning, often known as instrumental conditioning, is a type of conditioning in which the strength of a voluntary behavior is altered by rewarding or punishing it.

Opportunistic responses may be reinforced by classically conditioned stimuli. However, classical conditioning can have a variety of effects on operant conditioning.

Know more about classical conditioning with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/12691454

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
Piaget suggested that children do not develop object permanence until between 8 and 12 months of age. the research of renee bail
natita [175]
I believe the answer is: d. <span>Baillargeon eliminated the need for a child to have the motor skills necessary to display object permanence and focused instead on the patterns of their gazes
Development of object permanence would enhance the children's process in examining the environment around them. This would accelerate their understanding on their existence within the environment and the scope of things that they're able to do to their surrounding.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Latitude and longitude of Ontario
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

51.2538° N, 85.3232° W

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What does it means to have two person sitting on this two dangerous bombs in the image below?
iris [78.8K]

Answer:


Welsh-born cartoonist Leslie Gilbert Illingworth drew the famous cartoon of John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev arm wrestling while sitting on hydrogen bombs. It appeared in the October 29, 1962 edition of the British newspaper The Daily Mail.Born in 1902, Illingworth started drawing cartoons for the famous British news magazine Punch in 1927. The Daily Mail hired him as well in 1937 and he continued to provide cartoons for both publications for the rest of his career. He gained a measure of national fame for the effective cartoons he drew during England's dogged stand against Nazi Germany.Illingworth was not an overtly political cartoonist and this is evident in this arm wrestling cartoon. One notices the characteristic Illingworth preference for detail rather than commentary on who is right or wrong. The intensity of the struggle is captured both by the energy that radiates out of Kennedy and Khrushchev's gripped hands, but also by the fact that each is sweating profusely. Each man still has his finger on the button that will detonate the bombs.Illingworth's cartoon reminded readers that the superpower struggle would continue and that the possibility of nuclear annihilation remained.Illingworth's drawings contrast sharply with those of Edmund Valtman, the Pulitzer Prize-winning and fiercely anti-communist cartoonist for The Hartford Times. On October 30, after the crisis had seemingly passed, his paper published a Valtman cartoon of Khrushchev yanking missile-shaped teeth out of a hideous-looking Castro's mouth. The caption above the illustration reads, “This Hurts Me More Than It Hurts You” and the cartoon clearly represents a moment of American gloating over the communists.That the Illingworth cartoon was published in a British newspaper bears witness to the fact that the outcome of the Cuban Missile Crisis affected the fate of populations beyond those of the United States and the Soviet Union. Indeed the whole world was watching. The publication date of October 29 is also significant since on October 28, Khrushchev announced that he was withdrawing the missiles out of Cuba and the crisis seemingly had passed. Illingworth's cartoon reminded readers that the superpower struggle would continue and that the possibility of nuclear annihilation remained.

Explanation:

3 0
1 year ago
List the four theories about what was seen on Dimmesdale's chest on the scaffold and how it came to be there
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

In the final scaffold scene, some people do not see the letter "A" on Dimmesdale's chest at all. So, for them, it never existed. For those that did see it, some surmise that Dimmesdale had put it there himself, others that Chillingworth's medicine had somehow caused the "A" to emerge. Others suggested it was God's mark of sin. The most likely theory is that Dimmesdale put it there in order to punish himself. Chillingworth had discovered the "A" there earlier and seemed surprised and it is doubtful that any medicine would mark a person with a specific letter.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The goal of a new Central American group formed as an economic union is to have a Council of Ministers that would coordinate the
    9·1 answer
  • Taiwan earns much of it wealth from
    15·1 answer
  • 2. Compared to hunter foragers, agriculturalists terded
    14·1 answer
  • Tanya experiences pulsating, intense pain in her head. Prior to these attacks, her vision is distorted or she feels numbness in
    9·1 answer
  • What document that gives us first hand historial information is ______ source what is it called
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP!!! I need help with everything please actually answer it I don't like people not answering and taking the points I wor
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the bubonic plague?
    7·1 answer
  • Thomas Paine argued in Common Sense that
    8·1 answer
  • Ways of showing obedience to teachers​
    9·1 answer
  • State three types of work carriedout in your community. ​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!