Answer:
False
Explanation:
Soft money is a donation not directly given to a candidate but to a party to be used in National Committees, but not in a federal campaigners.
It is not so regulated as the Hard Money.
Since the Supreme Court has allowed this in 2014 after being banned by legislation in 2002 (<em>Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act</em>) it is not illegal. But it has some rules.
Answer: Proposal C
Explanation:
The way to solve this is to calculate the Present Values of all these payments. The smallest present value is the best.
Proposal A.
Periodic payment of $2,000 makes this an annuity.
Present value of Annuity = Annuity * ( 1 - ( 1 + r ) ^ -n)/r
= 2,000 * (1 - (1 + 0.5%)⁻⁶⁰) / 0.5%
= $103,451.12
Proposal B
Present value = Down payment + present value of annuity
= 10,000 + [2,200 * ( 1 - ( 1 + 0.5%)⁻⁴⁸) / 0.5%]
= 10,000 + 93,676.70
= $103,676.70
Proposal C
Present value = Present value of annuity + Present value of future payment
= [500 * (1 - (1 + 0.5%)⁻³⁶) / 0.5%] + [116,000 / (1 + 0.5%)⁶⁰]
= 16,435.51 + 85,999.17
= $102,434.68
<em>Proposal C has the lowest present value and so is best. </em>
I believe the least likely result is <span>The Securities and Exchange Commission could fine Bob..
</span>When Bob is working for someone, the owner of the establishment is the one that most likely to receive fine from the Securities and Exchange Comission since it would be very likely that Bob's just following his leader's order.
Answer:
Sunk cost fallacy.
Explanation:
Sunk costs - are costs that have been incurred as a result of past decisions. Now are unrecoverable.
A trap which enables a investor to invest more in the sunken costs to earn profit.
Are cost incurred in the past tha cannot be changed.
Sunk cost fallacy - considering sunk costs when making new decisions at the margin. Can lead to using out of date facilities and incurring large opportunity costs.
Is the continued investment in something no longer desired to reconcile the loss of the initial investment.
