The sentences that best support the author's claim that Sinclair's book accomplished something different from what Sinclair had hoped are:
- But Sinclair was surprised that it was his horrific description of how meat was processed that caused the biggest uproar. (paragraph 3)
- Sinclair remarked, “I aimed at the public's heart and by accident I hit it in the stomach.” (paragraph 3)
<h3>Meaning of claim</h3>
- A claim is a belief that the author or writer of a text holds. The claim that Sinclair's book accomplished something different from what he hoped can be seen in the two statements.
- In the first one, he expressed his surprise that it was because of the horrific description that an uproar was caused. In the second sentence, he remarked that while he aimed for the public's heart, he hit their stomach.
Learn more about claims here:
brainly.com/question/14953192
False. Lots of characters speak in prose when they are not saying something serious, or when they are upset or disturbed. Note Hamlet in his entire conversation with Osric and Horatio, while talking in his madness with the blind Gloucester. Hope this helps! ;D
Philip Caputo wanted the romance of war, bayonet charges, and desperate battles against impossible odds during the Vietnam War. hilip Caputo imagined himself charging up a beachhead, like John Wayne in Sands of Iwo Jima (1949), and this led him to join the Marines to fight in Vietnam. Michael Herr commented on the performance of `grunts' when they knew that there was a camera crew nearby and how they imitated the stars of war movies. So powerful were cinematic images of battle that soldiers acted as though they were on the screen according to Herr.
“Her” will be your answer