<span>1) command economies; 2) market economies and 3) traditional economies</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. It is not correct to try to convince the other person to agree with you when having a meaningful political conversation.
Explanation:
When talking about political issues, they often deal with controversial issues that can turn friendly talk into heated discussion. Therefore, as a way to prevent this, there are certain guidelines that must be taken into account.
Thus, not shouting, speaking personally and contemplating the opinion of the other party are fundamental criteria when it comes to having a serious and friendly political debate. In this way, cordiality regulates the content of the talk, and the acceptance of the thought different from the other (without the need to share it) gives legitimacy to the idea of the other person.
On the other hand, if in the conversation one of the parties tries to convince the other of its ideology, the conversation will most likely fail. This is so because when trying to convince, the other person's belief or conviction is discredited, a question that many people can take as a personal insult. Therefore, it is totally inadvisable to carry out this type of actions.
Anti-Federalists
- wanted a Bill of Rights in the Constitution
- did not like that the national government could have an army during peacetime
- policies favored farmers, artisans, and skilled workers
- did not approve of the necessary and proper clause (it gave too much power to the national government)
- feared a strong Executive branch would lead to a monarchy
- people must actively participate in order to have a free government
I think at this point your not going to get an awnser
