<span>This poll talks about the economic progress of the United States where during those times in year 2010 Barack Obama is the president of the country. The poll have given a big difference towards the evaluation on how the economy have a lot of negative effects to citizen of the country that it was before. First is the issue about unemployment many Americans have no jobs, remember that this issue really gives a fall towards economic progress development for it can help generate more potential opportunities specially when it comes to factors that are all in the benefit of people getting employed where the business can gain more with the workforce, second is the health care issues are also one of the factors considered why they are unsatisfied with the economy, the platform and campaigns relating to health issues were not that fully effective, lastly the federal budget deficit in which really imparts a major negative effect on the economy for this is used for many developmental projects for the government's economic stability.</span>
Answer:
Sustainability.
Explanation:
Sustainability intends on addressing current requirements, without undermining future generations to fulfill their needs. The notion of sustainable development consists of three key elements including economic, social, and environmental which correspond to three P's that are Profit, people, and planet respectively. It is a complex process that expands the objectives of businesses from immediate profit to future-oriented goals like energy conservation, work, and safety measures in an organization, etc.
Answer:
$29.70
Explanation:
Retention ratio = 1 - payout ratio
= ( 1 -0.5 )
= 0.5
Growth rate, g = ROE × Retention ratio
= 0.15 × 0.5
= 0.075
= 7.5%
Required return = Risk - free rate + [ Beta × (Market rate- risk-free rate) ]
= 2.5% + 1.44 × (11% - 2.5%)
= 14.74%
Intrinsic value = 
=
= 29.69 ≈ $29.70
Answer:
Equal to
Explanation:
Financial theory assumes that financial markets are efficient and that there is no information failure in conducting financial transactions. However, this is an assumption and there could, in some instances, be asymmetric information in the form of adverse selection and moral hazards. For example, if managers of a corporation know how well or how poorly their business is doing than stockholders (as organizational performance determines the price of a security), then there would be an information failure or informational inefficency. Also, a potential investor who cannot distinguish between a firm whose security has a high potential for profit and low risks compared to that with a low potential for profit and high risk will be willing to pay a price that lies between the value of stock from bad firms and the value of stock from good firms. This will not augur well for good firms as their stock is underpriced and they will be reluctant to sell.
When the financial market is efficient, investors of stock would be able to earn supernormal returns on their investments. It is therefore neccessary that the price of a corporation's common stock should be equal to the present value estimate of the firm's expected cash flows discounted by it appropriate rate of return.
