In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
Answer:
Wan is connected to people with a variety of backgrounds.
Explanation:
While the second may be true, the first one is the answer. He is likely a part of a place like LinkedIn, where networking is key.
Because through the election the other candidates did not get enough votes to continue running and new they would not get enough to catch up to Hillary and/or trump so they dropped out of the election which left the two remaining candidates or trump and Clinton
Answer:
It's a unit of measurement that is used to find out the country's economic output per person
Explanation:
GDP per capita is calculated by dividing the total amount of the Gross Domestic Product with the total amount of population that they have. It's a more reliable way to measure a country's wealth rather than using a GDP alone.
Higher GDP doesn't always mean that a certain country is more efficient in managing their economy compared to other country.
Countries with higher population tend to have higher GDP, but it doesn't mean that each person in that country has efficiently contributed to the country's economy.
For example, Singapore is a richer country than India even though it has a way smaller GDP. India produced a GDP of 2.719 trillion USD in 2018, while Singapore produced around GDP of 364.2 billion USD in 2018.
But, India earned that GDP by pooling out the strength from 1.353 billion population. Singapore on the other hand get that GDP from only having 5.639 million population GDP.per capita in Singapore is around 64,581.94 US , While India's GDP per capita is only around 2,009.98 USD
Answer: If this research is conducted between ages 13-70 years by random chance, the research result will be bias, because the tendency or probability of getting age 13-17 years kissing in public will be very low, because this age are still refered to as minor and may not have the boldness to kiss in public places. Also the tendency of getting age 50-70 years kissing in public places will be very low, because this age has grown old and the tendency or probability of their romantic life to be active at kissing in public places is very low. From age 18-40 years will be very much to seen if not all, and from age 41-49 will be a bit more. The conclusion of the research may be only for age 18-49 as it will be more easier to see this age kiss at public places. So for the researcher to use a research that more observation is see in age 18-49 years to draw conclusion for age 13-70 years, that's means he's conclusion will be bias because non or less observation is likely to be seen in age 13-17 and age 50-70 year.
