Hay una idea sobre la religión que puede incomodar tanto a ateos como a creyentes. Su universalidad hace pensar que está inscrita en el cerebro humano gracias a la selección natural, porque cumple alguna función que ayudó a los creyentes a sobrevivir. Los humanos habríamos evolucionado para crecer con el germen de la fe en algún tipo de dios o dioses, del mismo modo que, según planteó Noam Chomsky hace décadas, los niños vienen al mundo con estructuras neuronales que les permiten aprender el idioma de sus padres. Después, el entorno es el que determina el lenguaje o la religión particular que se aprende.
Answer: B
Explanation: Initial Public Offering
It is not a question that can be addressed empirically. The
word "empirical" specify information expanded by means of remark,
knowledge, or experimentations. Empirical questions are not responded
by remark. They are responded by the clarification of observations.
Alexander Hamilton wanted to create a national bank because he believed there should be a standard form of currency, and to finally put an end to close the massive debt war between the Northern and Southern states. Hope this helps (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
