Based on the statement and example given I strongly agree with the fact that we are influenced by social interactions
<h3>Meaning of Social Interactions.</h3>
Social interactions can be defined as a relationship between our social activities and how they shape and contribute to the building of our mindset.
Social Interactions have really shaped our choices and the choices of everyone in society both consciously and unconsciously.
In conclusion, Based on the statement and example given I strongly agree with the fact that we are influenced by social interactions
Learn more about Social Interactions: brainly.com/question/14013873
#SPJ1
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
A country's urbanization is measured by such factors as literacy rate<span>, </span>food consumption, and life expectancy<span>.? Follow ... Is it </span>true<span> most Americans only save up about $60,000 over their entire lifetime of saving? 8 answers.</span>
Whereas previous Chief Justices of the Supreme Court (John Jay, John Rutledge, and Oliver Ellsworth) left little real mark behind in there tenures, Marshall established several principles essential to the modern Supreme Court.
Most essential, in the <em>Marbury v Madison </em>case, his court established that the Supreme Court had the authority to overrule both laws of Congress, and the states, as well as executive acts if the court rules them to be in direct violation of the Constitution.
Believe it or not, Judicial Review was not originally initially in the constitution as defined above, and Marshall's court established it as a power in the Judical branch.
