One of the example would be C<span>hanging the data to support the hypothesis.
Changing data to support the hypothesis woulld definitely make the studies turn into wrong direction every course of the way.
If the study is being done for mass consumption (such as development of new drugs) , this type of behavior could could cause a lot of health risks to many people (even death)</span>
One problem resulting from urban areas growing is that family-farms are being sold out, and that affects the communities around it. And second, it affects the natural enviorment with pollution, no matter how many laws there are. Take L.A. for example, at times it can be very smogging. You see it in the sky but not many people speak out against it. It proabably was once a little town too.
Answer:
Has an exposure to negligent misrepresentation.
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation occurs when a person, in this case the agent in the exercise, has made a statement about something or someone (in this case a property) without having any reason to believe it true. As the name says, negligent misrepresentation; the agent should've noticed a clearly visible and obvious problem (negligence) and then he said it was all ok (misrepresentation).
<span>What used to be known as "multiple personality disorder" is now known as </span>Dissociative identity disorder (DID).
Not 100% sure if this is right but if it is multiple choice and this is an option than it is most likely correct...
