Before the panama canal people from East coast of America who wanted to go to Asia had to either sail around south America which took months or sail towards Asia and go around Africa which took even longer. The panama canal was a short cut right in the middle of central America which cut navigation time in half. Hope I helped. :)
Some might say FDR, some might say LBJ, others might say Nixon. The reality is that the power of the Legislative vis a vis the Executive is in constant flux.
In terms of sweeping policy initiatives FDR's administration might be the time when the Presidency took on many of its contemporary roles. The activism of the LBJ administration was a further expansion of the New Deal-era role of the FDR administration. LBJ also was arguably the first president to use the US armed forces in foreign engagements without Congress declaring war (Gulf of Tonkin resolution)--a precedent we have become all too familiar with. In terms of 'imperial pretensions' Nixon assumed all the New Deal, Great Society, civil rights activism, and the ability to intervene militarily of the preceding Presidencies and expanded them to include unfettered use of the CIA and FBI.
Answer:
She did not lead Egypt into war
Explanation:
She established a trade system which was much stronger than the previous
<span>constantine changed european history by giving christianity legal standing:
he changed the way the public looked at christianity and turned it into an accepted religion. he ended the persecution of christians and actually established it as the official religion of the land. constantine also moved the capital from Rome to byzantium, which was renamed constantinople. establishing constantinople eventually split the roman empire in two, eastern and western halves. This division eventually lead to the fall of the roman empire, with the western half of the roman empire falling about 1000 years before the eastern half.</span>
