1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NNADVOKAT [17]
3 years ago
14

On January 1, Year 2, Grande Company had a $63,400 balance in the Accounts Receivable account and a $1,300 balance in the Allowa

nce for Doubtful Accounts account. During Year 2, Grande provided $152,000 of service on account. The company collected $161,300 cash from accounts receivable. Uncollectible accounts are estimated to be 1% of sales on account. The amount of uncollectible accounts expense recognized on the Year 2 income statement is
Business
1 answer:
irinina [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

$1,520

Explanation:

Given that,

Accounts Receivable balance = $63,400

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts balance = $1,300

Services provided on account during year 2 = $152,000

Cash collected from accounts receivables = $161,300

Estimated Uncollectible accounts = 1% of sales on account

Therefore, the amount of uncollectible accounts expense during the year 2 is the 1 percent of the amount of services provided on account to a customer.

Hence, the amount of uncollectible accounts expense recognized on the Year 2 income statement is calculated as follows:

= Services provided on account × Estimated Uncollectible accounts

= $152,000 × 1%

= $1,520

You might be interested in
Monopolistic competition is similar to monopoly because
docker41 [41]

Answer:

B. in both industry​ structures, the firm's demand curve is downward sloping. 

Explanation:

Both firm types have a downward sloping demand curve which indicates that as price is increased, quantity demanded falls.

Monopolistic competition have no barriers to entry while a monopoly does.

Monopolistic competition have many sellers while a monopoly has one seller.

Monopolistic competition break even in the long run while monopoly maintain super normal profits in the long run

6 0
4 years ago
Reread the Country Focus "Moving U.S. White-Collar Jobs Offshore." Who benefits from the outsourcing of skilled white-collar job
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

Traditionally, economists and politicians all have argued that globalization led to outsourcing blue collar jobs or manufacturing jobs. But high skilled jobs, were still being carried out in the US, which meant that the good salaries and the highly trained employees remained.

In the recent years this assumption is falling apart. Many high skilled jobs, specially in the technology sector, have been outsourced to poor countries, specially India. The reasons why this happens are basically 3:

  1. The demand for highly trained employees increased and exceeds the supply (which is not bad).
  2. Formerly, highly trained employees from developing nations could enter the US labor force more easily. Changes in immigration laws have made it harder for high skilled immigrants to be able to work in the US (politicians are to blame).
  3. Corporations make a larger profit by hiring high skilled labor from poor countries, e.g. a n Indian engineer earns 20 times less than an American engineer (corporate greed is the culprit).

The US and other developed countries can really hurt from the outsourcing of highly skilled workers. It is simply unrealistic to believe that just because an engineer is American, he/she will be better than someone from other place. There is no biologic or cultural basis for believing that, all you need to do is look at where Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Serguei Brin, Sundar Pichai and many others were born.

The basic reason why America became the world's most powerful country is that immigrants that searched for a better life were able to develop and carry out ideas here. Many of these immigrants would have never been able to do something great if they hadn't come to America. E.g. Apple wouldn't exist if Steve Jobs had remained in Syria, Google, Tesla wouldn't either: if you go back 60 years in time, FB wouldn't exist if Mark Zuckerberg's had gone somewhere else. The list goes on and on, and many American corporations were formed by immigrants.

America grew because it attracted talent, but now it is repelling it. When corporations hire foreign talent they are not just saving money, they are killing American jobs that are not easily replaceable. It is not the same to fire someone that flips hamburgers, than to fire someone that develops software.

The government should stop this, since it is fairly simple to do it. Many developed countries like Canada or Australia base their immigration policies on merit and qualifications. If a person is highly trained and is able to perform specialized jobs, then they are allowed to immigrate. If they are not highly skilled, then, bye bye. E.g. there are millions of highly trained people from Latin-america and Asia that could serve the US economy and help it grow. Instead there are millions of very low skilled immigrant workers that add very little to the US economy. The government can also impose a special tax on highly skilled outsourced jobs. That tax would be legal, unlike import tariffs that violate the rules of the WTO.

6 0
4 years ago
In return for participation and cooperation in instituting a major organizational change, marietta textiles employees received t
jarptica [38.1K]
<span>When employees feel like lose powers or tasks during the change process, it is important to keep them motivated. Offering financial or mental incentives can move employees into a positive direction. The employee can be offered incentives to leave the company early, their contracts may be adjusted or another job or promotion is offered. This method is actually called Negotiation and rewards.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
How to earn money using smartphones please help mee​
taurus [48]
Download solitaire cube
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(03.03 mc)you just saw an advertisement that asks, "all your friends have switched to our pizza; when will you?" what technique
shutvik [7]
<span>bandwagon
 A bandwagon is a trend that is so cool everyone wants to get in on it. If you start wearing a flowerpot on your head because everyone else is, you've jumped on a strange fashion bandwagon. Originally, a bandwagon was a large wagon that did indeed carry a band.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lupe rented her personal residence for 13 days to summer vacationers for $3,800.
    14·1 answer
  • You take out a $10,000 loan to purchase a used car. You have the choice to pay
    8·1 answer
  • Seymour wants the best interest rate possible, and he doesn't need access to his money for many years. Which of these options fo
    9·2 answers
  • Howard Becker’s labeling theory argues that no act is deviant until a society labels it as deviant. Explain why Becker and other
    11·1 answer
  • Marwick's Pianos, Inc., purchases pianos from a large manufacturer and sells them at the retail level. The pianos cost, on the a
    14·1 answer
  • Prepare journal entries to record each of the following transactions of a merchandising company. The company uses a perpetual in
    11·1 answer
  • . What is a great system to manage money and prevent taking too much from one category? Please describe the
    7·1 answer
  • What is Newtons law on gravity?
    15·1 answer
  • A letter of application should be written on:
    13·1 answer
  • The statement that provides the financial position of a company as of a specific date is the.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!