The answer to this question is <span>Griswold v. Connecticut
The case revolved around </span><span>The case involved a </span>Connecticut<span> "</span>Comstock law<span>" which basically ban any form of substance that could intervene with pregnancy.
The court later rule that whether to use or not use birth control is the right of the people who did the intimate act and all people shall obtain their right to privacy.</span>
Answer:
it would be A
Explanation:
Why would anyone do something that drastic if its not that important
Answer:
external cause
Explanation:
Elaina is showing a common phenomenon in social psychology:
the attribution to external causes, which means that she assigns the cause of a happening to situations that are external to her, and rather than assessing her performance in terms of her inner characteristics.
She could have also <em>expressed how her feelings and state of mind at that time played a part, but instead, she is making external attributions, like "judges being unfair by giving her all harder words".</em>
The attribution theory in social psychology see how people try to point out to more causes that are in the surroundings or external, and often this influences their motivations and behaviour.
If people make inferences why others behave in a certain way and they refer to the outside then, we speak of external causes.
Social perception and self-perception can have internal, external causes and often we are advised to seek motivations in any of these ways.
