1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enot [183]
3 years ago
7

What are the major arguments against judicial review?

History
1 answer:
ad-work [718]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Judicial Review is controversial as it has the power to change the laws without the states or federal powers validation.  

The major arguments against it are: first, the power of judicial review is not established explicitly in the constitution.  

The second is that only the states alone are the only ones to have the power to change the law.

You might be interested in
What was the Roosevelt Corollary? What did it do?
anzhelika [568]

<em>A corollary (1904) to the Monroe Doctrine, asserting that the U.S. might intervene in the affairs of an American republic threatened with seizure or intervention by a European country, Monroe Doctrine had sought to prevent European intervention, the </em><u> Roosevelt Corollary was used to justify US intervention throughout the hemisphere</u>. In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt <u>renounced interventionism and established his Good Neighbor policy for the Western Hemisphere.</u>


7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not part of the presidents responsibilities as party leader?
stellarik [79]

Answer:

The answer is D. :)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 19 year-old was arrested for burglary and the case went to trial. After three hours of deliberations, an unbiased group found
34kurt

Answer:

B. Trial by Jury I believe,

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which perspective was held by the founders of the American Indian movement in the late 1960
frez [133]
What are the options?
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the United States provide loans to Latin American states after they hand won their independence from Spain?
Marizza181 [45]

The reasons why the United States provided loans for the Latin American countries after they gained independence from Spain were mostly of economic and political interests.

By providing loans to these newly formed nations, the United States tried to create a positive opinion by the people in these nations about them, as they would have thought that the United States are helping them to develop. The real reason why the loans were granted though was to make these nations economically dependent and connected with the United States, thus the United States to have big power over them. Also, because this is a region in the neighborhood of the United States, they wanted to make sure that they would have things under control, create good relations with these nations, and avoid any future problems.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the similarities between the US bill of rights and later amendments ?
    12·1 answer
  • What pamphlet is credited as being one of the instigators of the French Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Would you have supported going to war against great britain
    9·1 answer
  • What caused the stock market crash of 1929 answers
    11·1 answer
  • The passage below about debate is from a 1964 Supreme Court ruling. Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and w
    12·2 answers
  • Enock
    5·1 answer
  • What are some challenges you think the next generation will face?
    10·2 answers
  • 3. Which of these statements BEST reflects the views of members of the
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following did not help the Spaniards succeed in conquering the New World people
    11·1 answer
  • Explain Greeks as the pioneers of historigraphy​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!