Answer:
(A) market saturation
Explanation:
A franchisee starts a new franchise by entering into a franchising agreement with a franchiser to use its brand name and sell its products. The biggest challenge faced by this new franchise is market saturation.
This occurs because<u> the presence of other similar businesses, whether franchises or independently owned businesses in the market, creates lots of competition for the new franchise.</u>
<span>b. he/she is not making good use of scarce resources</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": set aside any award.
Explanation:
Arbitrators are individuals without the range of judges that are called in disputes to resolve a matter before taking it to court. Similar to trials, each party involved in the dispute present their defense in front of the arbitrator who promotes the mutual agreement between the two parties but, if that does not happen, the arbitrator provides a resolution that tends to be definite.
<em>Arbitrators must be impartial. Thus, if the arbitrator meets with one of the parties and, eventually, the decision of that case favors that party, the court can take away any reward provided until an investigation is conducted.</em>
Answer:
(A) Accounts Payable - Liabilities
(D) Equipment - Assets
(E) Supplies - Assets
(F) Retained earning - Owner's Equity
(H) Cash - Assets
Explanation:
The major categories in a balance sheets are: Assets, Liabilities and Owner's Equity,
Assets are many things (as equipment, machinery, Receivables, etc) that belongs to the company, please see details in the answer.
Liabilities represent the obligations of the company with all kind of creditors.
And finally Owner's Equity it's the Capital that support part of the Assets along with the Liabilites.
The syllogism used is conditional, that is, it occurs through deductive reasoning, because if the minor premise is true, the minor premise will also be true.
<h3 /><h3>What is Conditional syllogism?</h3>
It is a type of syllogism widely used in everyday life, but the conclusion is not always true, because despite having two true premises, the conclusion can be false, because the argumentation is not always valid, as it does not directly represent the premises.
Therefore, despite being syllogisms that follow the pattern of "If" and "then" to express a logic, the conclusion will not always be true, as this type of syllogism can also be hypothetical.
Find out more about syllogism here:
brainly.com/question/361872
