here two given sides are 10 and 6,
We use the rule of triangle here:
sum of two sides> third side
checking for each option
Option A: AC=4
4+6>10, 10>10 (false)
So AC cannot be equal to 4, option A is answer.
Answer:
Since 2.1387 is Greater Than 1.645;
we reject null hypothesis; we conclude that, the nickname is justified based on the data.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data in the question;
Null hypothesis H₀ : p = 0.262
Alternative Hypothesis H₁ : p > 0.262.
p" = 0.357
q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.262 = 0.738
n = 98
so;
z = (p" - p) / √(pq/n)
we substitute
z = (0.357 - 0.262) / √((0.262×0.738) / 98)
z = 0.095 / 0.04441869
z = 2.1387
at 5% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
z-critical = 1.645
Since 2.1387 is Greater Than 1.645;
we reject null hypothesis; we conclude that, the nickname is justified based on the data.
48/12 = 4
4 is your constant
