All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following lists is in order from smallest to largest?

Mathematics

2 answers:

kakasveta [241]3 years ago

7 0

The order from smallest to largest is 1.1%, 0.1, 1/9, 2/11.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the order of numbers from smallest to largest, first we have to convert the numbers in the same unit.

1/9 = 0.1111

0.1 = 0.1

1.1% = 0.011

2/11 = 0.1818

Now arrange the numbers from smallest to largest.

0.011 < 0.1 < 0.1111 < 0.1818

i.e. 1.1% < 0.1 < 0.011 < 0.1818

Therefore 1.1%, 0.1, 1/9, 2/11 is in the order from smallest to largest.

Bezzdna [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The order from smallest to largest is 1.1%, 0.1, 1/9, 2/11.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the order of numbers from smallest to largest, first we have to convert the numbers in the same unit.

1/9 = 0.1111

0.1 = 0.1

1.1% = 0.011

2/11 = 0.1818

Now arrange the numbers from smallest to largest.

0.011 < 0.1 < 0.1111 < 0.1818

i.e. 1.1% < 0.1 < 0.011 < 0.1818

Therefore 1.1%, 0.1, 1/9, 2/11 is in the order from smallest to largest.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Which is the additive inverse of the complex number -8+3i?

lawyer [7]

The additive inverse of a complex z is a complex number $-z,$ so that

$\mathsf{z+(-z)=-z+z=0+0i=0}$

Finding $-z:$

$\mathsf{z=-8+3i}\\\\\\ \mathsf{z+(-z)=0+0i}\\\\\ \mathsf{-8+3i+(-z)=0+0i}\\\\ \mathsf{-z=0+0i+8-3i}\\\\ \mathsf{-z=(0+8)+(0i-3i)}\\\\ \boxed{\begin{array}{c}\mathsf{-z=8-3i} \end{array}}\qquad\checkmark$

If you're having problems understanding this answer, try seeing it through your browser: <span>brainly.com/question/2159647

</span>I hope this helps.

Tags: <em>complex number additive inverse opposite algebra</em>

3 0

3 years ago

In a recent survey 55% of pet owners have more than one pet if there was 620 pet owners survey which proportion could be used to

Alika [10]

Answer:

341..

Step-by-step explanation:

i would personally say 341 because 620 multiplied by 55% or .55, as written on a calculator, would be 341.

5 0

3 years ago

6. Let A and B be nxn matrices . Compute (A + B) (A + B). Explain all steps.

Pie

Answer:

(A+B)(A+B)=A.A+B.A+A.B+B.B

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that matrices A and B are nxn matrices

We need to find (A+B)(A+B)

For understanding the multiplication of matrices let'take A is mxn and B is pxq matrices,we can multiple only when n=p,so our Ab matrices will be mxq.

We know that that in matrices AB is not equal to BA.

Now find

(A+B)(A+B)=A.A+B.A+A.B+B.B

So from we can say that (A+B)(A+B) is not equal to A.A+2B.A+B.B because AB is not equal to BA in matrices.

So (A+B)(A+B)=A.A+B.A+A.B+B.B

4 0

2 years ago

The line width used for semiconductor manufacturing is assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 0.5 micrometer and a st

Alinara [238K]

Answer:

There is a 0.82% probability that a line width is greater than 0.62 micrometer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean $\mu$ and standard deviation $\sigma$ , the zscore of a measure X is given by

$Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$

After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X. The sum of the probabilities is decimal 1. So 1-pvalue is the probability that the value of the measure is larger than X.

In this problem

The line width used for semiconductor manufacturing is assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 0.5 micrometer and a standard deviation of 0.05 micrometer, so $\mu = 0.5, \sigma = 0.05$ .